Monday, November 15, 2010

While trying to get my mind around the problems of the Irish government debt levels I came across this 2007 survey from Oliver Wyman: http://www.oliverwyman.com/ow/pdf_files/SPI_CS_0107.pdf

The relevant quote on Anglo Irish Bank is on p23:

Anglo Irish Bank owes much of its success to a concentrated focus on business lending, treasury and wealth management in the Irish, UK and US markets. Business lending, its largest and most profitable segment, has grown by 38% annually over the last 10 years. A centralized loan approval process has helped the bank maintain high asset quality and minimize the risks of portfolio concentration. In addition, the bank has exploited synergies among its narrow business mix to achieve a low cost-income ratio of 27%, providing a strong foundation for organic growth.

Anglo Irish went bust in 2008 mainly because of its centralized loan approval process that led to very low asset quality and excessively high portfolio concentration.

It's another warning to us all; unless we're actually sitting in the decision making centres of the financial institution on a day to day basis there is no way we can accurately make the sort of statements made by Oliver Wyman. Even if you think you're in the decision making centre we know there can be catastrophic stresses building up that aren't reported.

It seems the purist (simplest?) thing to do would be for the Irish government to put the all the troubled banks into bankruptcy, and then argue long and loud that:

  • it's not the government that defaulted - the government might have guaranteed the debts, but it was lied to during the negotiations, so all guarantees are off;
  • all lenders (apart from retail depositors) need to be reminded what credit risk really means - which part of the word "risk" don't they understand?
  • Senior secured lenders can be given the banks' assets (good luck to them) - unsecured and junior lenders get wiped out;
  • It's then up to the German and French governments, if necessary, to bail out their banks that lent to Irish banks.

Comments welcome.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

FT.com / Companies / Financial Services - Departures at Gartmore could spark end game

FT.com / Companies / Financial Services - Departures at Gartmore could spark end game: "Others are more critical. A top 20 shareholder in Gartmore, who has seen the value of his shares collapse from 220p when purchased in the IPO to just 107p yesterday, said: “There are serious questions to be asked, [such as] why a company which was so reliant on just two people was allowed to list in the first place."

The more serious question is why did this top 20 shareholder invest in a company with such a large risk?

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Risk Management pays

This has just come out. www.nber.org/papers/w16178


Ellul, A. and V. Yerramilli (2010). Stronger risk controls, lower risk: Evidence from US Bank holding companies. Cambridge, MA, NBER.

In this paper, we investigate whether US bank holding companies (BHCs) with strong and independent risk management functions have lower enterprise-wide risk. We hand-collect information on the organisational structure of the risk management function at the 74 largest publicly-listed BHCs and use this information to construct a Risk Management Index (RMI) that measures the strength of organisational risk controls. We find that BHCs with a high RMI in the year 2006 had lower exposure to private label mortgage backed securities, were less active in trading off-balance sheet derivatives, had a smaller fraction of non-performing loans and had lower downside risk during the crisis years. In a panel spanning the 9 year period 2000-08, we find that BHCs with higher RMIs have lower enterpise wide risk, after controlling for size, profitability, a variety of risk characteristics, corporate governance, CEO's pay-performance sensitivity and BHC fixed effects. This result holds even after controlling for any dynamic endogeneity between risk and internal risk controls. Overall, these results suggest that strong internal risk controls are effective in restraining risk-taking behaviour at banking institutions.


The risk management index (RMI) measures presence of CRO, if CRO is among the 5 highest paid executives, and relative pay CRO vs CEO. The RMI also considers composition of the board’s Risk Committee (whether there is significant banking experience??), frequency of meetings of risk committee.

Also finds that stock market rewards banks with higher RMI."

Monday, August 16, 2010

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Spreading the word on MMT

I've a small defense of MMT on Crikey.

http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/02/for-policy-makers-inflation-vs-deflation-is-a-choice-between-two-evils/#comment-88449